MENC Forums

For today’s students to succeed tomorrow, they need a comprehensive education that includes music taught by exemplary music educators.

To help members in this quest, MENC provides a forum for discussing professional concerns in music education.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Quick update, August 20, 2010: We have updated the forum rules and added a FAQ. Email Paul Fergus with your comments and/or questions.

#1 2008-06-18 09:40:22

CudeJunior
Participant
Registered: 2008-04-14
Posts: 39

Music teacher hierarchy

We were getting quite off-topic on Keira's "tee tee" post, so I figured we should start a new thread devoted to the prevalent hierarchy that is manifesting itself in our school music programs.  For those of you who didn't read her post, a lively discussion began about the existing stereotype that high school is the be-all-end-all of the education world and that those of us who are elementary teachers have somehow "settled" for what we do.

I, too, am a band transplant that went to college with aspirations of becoming a high school band director.  When it came time to find a job, I was offered some wonderful positions in prestigious districts, but for some reason they just weren't calling to me.  Somehow, I already felt burned out.

I randomly applied for a general music position, and was floored when I was offered the job with no elementary experience whatsoever.  It turned out to be a huge turning point in my life and I haven't looked back since.  I wonder how I could've gone through so many years without realizing that elementary general music is my true calling.  The joy I get from the students and the lightbulb learning moments that I create are SO much more rewarding to me then band ever was.

Like many of you, though, I was shocked to hear the negative comments from my peers and, sadly, my professors.  I had a professor tell me I was "selling out" and trying to take the "easy path" where I should be paving the way for other female band directors.  A few of my friends boasted about their high school positions and basically wrote me off as a professional equal from that point on.  This translated further into the districts I worked.  One district had an incompetent high school band director that they "demoted" to elementary general music.  It truly is a slap in the face when you see the disgusting hierarchy that many allow themselves to create.

That being said, I have never received these feelings from co-workers in the three districts I have been in.  I have had positive relationships with the middle and high school teachers, and my current district even put us in an inservice together to align our curriculum.  Their understanding of what we teach may not be great, but the respect and desire to learn about it was high.

So let's continue the dialogue....how can we break this stereotype and educate our fellow educators?

Offline

 

#2 2008-06-18 17:22:45

Christine Nowmos
2006 October General Music Mentor
From: Woodstown, NJ
Registered: 2008-04-10
Posts: 1094
Website

Re: Music teacher hierarchy

I sort of touched on this in one of my replies to the "tee tees" thread (you're right Katie, it was really getting off topic, thanks for starting a new topic!), which I've copied below.  I think, too, that this especially needs to be addressed at the university level as a part of undergraduate music education coursework.  ALL candidates for a music education degree need to be made aware of research that's been done in childhood musical development regardless of whether or not they plan to eventually go on to work at the early childhood or elementary level, because the experiences of students in their elementary/developmental stage has an impact on their achievement at the secondary level.  This developmental information needs to be taught, not just stuff about methodology or how to write lesson plans, because unless we know HOW kids learn music, trying to teach them is an uphill battle frustrrating for both the child and the teacher.   I did not find out any of this until AFTER I graduated, got a job teaching general music, and embarked on a masters program concentrating in elementary methods plus further research/reading that I've done.  I got none of this important info as part of my bachelor's coursework, and in fact.... my experience was similar to yours, Katie, I went to college with the goal of being a band director, actually taught band for 4 years, and also... my boss whose band job I resigned from gave me the same kind of attitude, that I was taking a "lesser" position in going to teach general music.  I basically took the job initially to get into the public school pension system (and wasn't really enjoying teaching band as much as I thought I would)... and really had little to no background about general music, not much in the way of methodology in my college classes.   The professor that taught my "elementary methods" classes was primarily a band guy, the director of bands at the college, and although he had a doctorate in music education had hardly had any experience teaching elementary general music at all (and what he had had was decades ago), and NO training in any methodologies and didn't give us any info at all on childhood musical development.  Now, I can only say that this was just MY experience and I do know now of some other undergraduate programs that have a very intensive elementary methods course that addresses all this important information (such as where I took my masters, West Chester University, and also Westminster Choir College and I think Temple University have very good undergraduate courses on elementary methods, I would also assume Hartt School of Music since that's where John Feierabend is based.  If only I could go back in time....).  But... I think in some places there is still an attitude among the "performance track" faculty that general music isn't as prestigious as instrumental or choral music is, and of course this attitude rubs off on students... and then when teachers get hired into programs that have competitive bands or choirs and start to win awards, that just validates this attitude (what I do is more important than what you do, because look at all these trophies my group has won.  How many trophies have YOU won?). 

Also, my own personal experience with general music as a child, as probably many people's experience of my generation and older (I was in elementary school in the 70's and my music teachers were both reaching retirement age, so I doubt they'd had any training in Kodaly or Orff or other specific methodology and I don't think certification courses in these methodologies were very common back before that time as they were just being introduced in the US), was very mediocre and uninspiring.  SEVERAL adults have told me that their music teacher when they were a kid told them just to mouth the words at concerts, or singled them out and made them feel bad because they couldn't match pitch, or just that music class was just boring or they learned meaningless information.  If this is most other people's experience, including our colleagues who teach band, choir, orchestra, etc. who also haven't had much in depth training about the various methodologies or musical development/aptitude, it's no wonder they think our jobs aren't as important as ours.  I think it's just been in the last generation that child-developmental based methodologies/approaches such as Kodaly, Orff, Gordon, etc. that are both enjoyable and address concrete musical concepts have been in wide use.  And even so, unless someone goes out of their way to take a methodology course you don't really get the in-depth information about how to utilize them so some people try to use methodologies with only part of the information - like someone said, using solfege or rhythm sylalbles and then thinking you're teaching with the Kodaly approach and then getting a negative attitude about it because it's not working. 

I have occasionally been checking out the Band message board and now and then I read a comment that just seems so off base as to what general music teachers do or questions about "why is my band having trouble with this basic skill like keeping a steady beat" - and I have not been afraid to put my 2 cents in about how important adequate musical experiences PRIOR to performing ensembles are.  Maybe some of them think I'm just some nut-case sticking my nose in where I don't belong, but I have also had a few positive responses to what I have to say - after all I have had experience teaching band as well as general music.  I think it's great that we as professionals have this forum to communicate with each other and I think it's important that we occasionally check out what everyone else is doing whether or not it affects us a great deal.  So... I guess the best way to approach this is to just keep the lines of communication open first in our own districts and spreading outward, and hopefully also for universities to get some really great elementary methods faculty who can present this information well and change attitudes. 

-----------
This was my previous post about how we can change attitudes:

Through regular meeting and collaboration on stuff like curriculum and other issues that affect the music department district wide.  I am fortunate to work in a district that gives us in-service time throughout the year and for some of this we are expected to meet as a department and discuss issues that affect us and make sure curriculum is updated.  The middle and high school teachers know what and how I teach because we talk about it.  In fact, most of the other music teachers in the district have seen me teaching - the H.S. choir teacher is my accompanist so he is present at some of my rehearsals, the M.S. choir/gen. music teacher has observed me teaching as part of a professional development activity, and the elem. band teacher has observed me as well as I am his mentor this year (and, the former teacher who also taught MS/HS band previously worked in my building and... basically since we share a room they have no choice but to occasionally see me teaching!), so they can see how what it do fits into the big picture of their students' music education.  Plus, when we get the chance to talk, I can explain a little bit about the approach and philosophy behind what I do, and some of the research I've read - which of course most of them don't have much contact with being immersed in performance-oriented classes - and usually the response is, "I didn't know that, that's really interesting, that really makes sense..." because they're working with older kids and don't have the experience with younger kids and how important it is.  Plus... I have had 4 of our H.S. choir teacher's own children go through (or are currently going through) my general  music program because they also live in the district, and the kids come home singing songs or telling him about stuff they've learned - so he can get the 'dope' right from his kids as to how much they're learning.

Last edited by Christine Nowmos (2008-06-18 17:41:59)

Offline

 

#3 2008-06-19 21:43:46

Bob
Participant
Registered: 2008-04-10
Posts: 478

Re: Music teacher hierarchy

I've heard of it and seen it.  I know of one case where the high school director ticked off the community got "demoted" that way.  I never understood it but I see it. 

Maybe because the high school band is the flashier one going to contest, doing parades and pep band.  Very visible.

And even among music teachers.  "Why are you teaching general music?" some have asked me with surprise.  Because that's what I could get. :D :p  And I've heard several band directors complain about having to teach the next crop of band kids everything because "she" does her own thing.  Which tells me there's a lack of communication among the teachers. 

Communication, having the curriculum lined up.  Recognition at the concerts.  I've seen a few teachers who thank everyone, including all the students past music teachers. 

I suppose part of it is the why the whole system is set up.  If you're doing high school, you're kind of living that job.  If you want time or a life outside of school, you might not take that job.  You might take junior high or general music instead and have more evening time that way.  I wonder what it would be like if a typical high school job were split into two position so those teachers didn't have to devote their life to the program.  And then there is the competition and prestige thing with high school band... I got a trophy, we went to marching band, I have this monster job and can do it all.  I never went in for that stuff much and don't really care about it. 

In the job market, there are just more elementary music postions.  Several elementaries feed a few middle schools who feed THE high school.  The admin doesn't care what you're specialized in.  You have a music degree.  You can teach anything music-related. 

I do think general music can be done sloppily because it's hidden.  It doesn't have the expectations that a high school band has so you have a lot of leeway in what you teach.  You don't have to have all the specialization that a high school band might need, but those jobs don't give much wiggle room for doing things you're own way.  You already have a good idea of what a high school band is going to be doing every day, but general music?  There are a lot of options.

And it could be the personality thing.  A typical general music teacher compared to a typical high school band director.  I would guess the director is a lot more stressed, maybe under more pressure, and probably has a few deadlines given to them on their mind all the time.  The typical general music teacher?... Maybe more focused on making the kids feel happy and enjoy music.

Offline

 

#4 2008-06-20 09:27:02

Martha
Participant
From: Hampton, VA
Registered: 2008-04-10
Posts: 233
Website

Re: Music teacher hierarchy

I don't know why this hierarchy exists but I will admit that I bought into it all the way until I took elementary methods in college.  Up until then I felt like I didn't want to "just" teach elementary music.  Fortunately I had an amazing Music Ed professor who showed me that elementary music teachers often teach a lot MORE music than their choral or instrumental colleagues.  Once my mind was opened I was open to accepting some elementary jobs, which I have found very challenging and satisfying although in a much different way than instrumental music.

Offline

 

#5 2008-06-20 18:49:14

Christine Nowmos
2006 October General Music Mentor
From: Woodstown, NJ
Registered: 2008-04-10
Posts: 1094
Website

Re: Music teacher hierarchy

Martha wrote:

Once my mind was opened I was open to accepting some elementary jobs, which I have found very challenging and satisfying although in a much different way than instrumental music.

I definitely agree with this statement - it is just as challenging as teaching instrumental music, if not more so, but in a different way.  And  I feel that fits my personality better - not just the opportunity to work with younger students and in many cases be their first and only exposure to musical experiences setting the foundation for their musical experiences for the rest of their life, but also I'm really a "big picture" kind of person and also the type of person who likes to work out multiple ways to get from A to B.  With teaching such a variety and large population of children you really have the chance to work that way, and also the freedom to experiment with trying new things and be creative a lot more than you do in band or chorus, where usually the main goal is performance.  I did a good job teaching band and got good evaluations from my supervisor and principals, my students learned to play their instruments and read music well and put on successful performances, and the band programs I taught grew in strength and numbers during the years I was there, but I didn't get the sense of "this is what I was meant to do" when I was teaching band.  Before I got my first general music job, I really had no idea of how challenging and inspiring it can be - as I mentioned, not having had in retrospect what I feel was adequate preparation for it (and also in retrospect I am slightly bitter about having had a second-rate experience in my elementary methods class because the college I went to didn't seem to feel it was a priority to hire someone who had expertise and was a general music specialist).   

I will admit that my first couple years teaching general music were done mainly by trial and error and fortunately overall I had a good instinct for what would work but really no direction to what I was doing or what I wanted to the kids to accomplish because I had very little concrete knowledge of any particular methodologies - although I did figure out pretty early that the pre-made lesson plans in the series book usually didn't work very well (the activities and material often didn't hold the kids' attention very long).   I think this is the key that once I started to do some research and get more training about how kids learn music, different approaches that were developmental and sequential based, the more I was intrigued and then wanted to learn even MORE, and the more I started to realize how important my job was.  Now, not everybody has the personality to be an elementary general music teacher and many are more suited to the more focused and specialized tasks of teaching instrumental or choral performance (and as much as I like teaching chorus and have gotten better at it, I love teaching general music even more),  and some people have personalities better suited for working with older students who have more developed cognitive processing skills.... but, like I said I think it's important for all music ed candidates regardless of what teaching area they plan on going into to have some basic information about how kids BEGIN as musicians so that teachers in a district are able to collaborate and coordinate curriculum and it's not just everyone doing their own thing.  Plus, when you do get kids who have special needs or who transfer in from a district that didn't have the same amount of basic musicianship preparation, you need to know how to help them succeed because what works for the majority of your students might not work for them.  I know some secondary programs have the option of choosing who is in their ensembles (and I've seen some posts on the Band  message board to the effect that "If so and so isn't cutting the mustard and doesn't have the motivation to practice or the right attitude and is bringing down the quality of the band, then maybe he/she doesn't belong in band and you should have him/her transferred out of the class.") but we as general music teachers have to help ALL students meet standards in whatever way we can whether or not the kids want to learn.  We have to MAKE them excited about learning, we don't just get the kids who are already excited about learning music.   We have to espouse the attitude that learning music isn't just about creating performances;  it is about making sure that every person is able to understand and appreciate music of many types and be able to use it to express or enjoy themselves even if they never plan on participating in a chorus, band, or orchestra - a parent should be able to sing a lullaby to their child, sing Happy Birthday or the National Anthem at a sporting event without feeling embarrassed about it, have enough sense of beat to be able to dance at their prom or their wedding... and if their parents don't teach them these skills and they don't learn them in music class as children, they may never learn them.  Plus, if people learn from a young age how to listen to music and have basic knowledge of how music is put together, even if they don't choose to be a performer they will learn how to be a better audience for people who DO perform (it'll do little good to have a superior rated band or choir if there's nobody in the audience that appreciates the quality of the performance and music and has the patience and musical attention span to listen to the performance!).  I know I'm preaching to the choir here... but I think however and whenever we can get a chance to collaborate or communicate with our colleagues in secondary or performance oriented music education we should take every opportunity to educate them, even if it's just one small item or piece of information, about the reasons behind why our jobs are so important and how challenging they are.

Last edited by Christine Nowmos (2008-06-20 19:01:22)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson